“Affordable rent is a new funding model, which involves three main changes: housing providers can charge higher rents for affordable housing than previously (up to 80 per cent of market rates), both for new homes and for some new tenancies of existing homes; housing providers finance a greater proportion of the cost of new homes themselves, through increased borrowing; and the Department pays less grant for each new home provided.” (National Audit Office)
The coalition government’s Affordable Homes Programme 2011-15 introduced a new rent for council and housing association homes. ‘Affordable Rent’ (AR) could be charged up to 80% of market rents in each locality. Councils applying for grant for building new homes did so on the understanding that they would have to charge AR in new build properties rather than ‘social rent’ (SR), and convert some existing homes from SR to AR. The rationale for AR was to “maximise delivery of new affordable housing supply”. In fact it was part and parcel of the government’s austerity programme. Grant towards new build was cut by two thirds (as compared to New Labour’s National Affordable Homes Programme) to around £20,000 per property.
This was supposedly a £12 billion programme for new homes. However, only £1.8 billion was government grant. The rest was provided by the higher tenant rents on the new properties (estimated to be around £6 billion by the NAO) and funding of £4 billion from other sources (including commercial borrowing, converting social housing properties to AR and property sales).
Ironically, considering the government’s attempt to drive down the housing benefit bill, one of the consequences of “affordable rent” is a significant increase in that bill on what is a fairly small programme. The NAO estimated that this programme alone would increase housing benefit payments by around £1.4 billion over 30 years.
As the House of Commons Committee on Public Accounts pointed out, cutting subsidy whilst introducing “affordable rents”, and hence increasing housing benefit, was simply shifting the cost from one department to another.
The second phase of the government’s Affordable Housing Programme for 2016-21, did not offer grant for social housing, save for a miniscule 8,000 of supported housing units. This changed in 2017 when Teresa May announced that grant would be available for new SR properties, though there was no indication as to the amount of funding which would be available.
We now have some idea of the scale of support for SR. Homes England has just released a summary of the government’s Affordable Homes Programme 2016-21 which records the numbers of homes funded up to September 2019. There are in England 166 councils that have a Housing Revenue Account (HRA). They are required to have one if they own 200 or more council homes. At the end of the financial year 2018-19 there were 1,583,858 council owned properties. Most of these are SR. Of these councils 122 have introduced AR whilst 44 have not. The number of AR homes is relatively small; 21,878, just 1.38% of the stock1. That probably reflects the low level of new build but also the opposition of some councils to introducing higher AR which is unaffordable for many people. The average SR in England was £85.55 a week at the end of the 2018-19 financial year. AR is on average 34% higher at £115.142. This may not seem a lot of difference to some people but to those who are in low paid or precarious work it’s a big difference. Obviously the more bedrooms the higher the rent. The average three bedroom AR rent is £127.04. Moreover as you can see from Table 3 below, which shows detail of all councils with 100 or more AR properties, there is a significant variation which results from the linking of council rents with market rents. The lowest AR is less than 12% higher than the local ‘social rent’. However, in areas where market prices are much higher, AR can be up to double the local SR. Ironically in Tower Hamlets, one of the poorest boroughs in the country AR is more than double SR.
Of 57,543 homes funded by grant3 from Homes England only 5.16%, that is 2,972 were SR. Including 611 built without grant, the SR number climbs to 3,583. This is just 4% of all schemes agreed by Homes England. Of more than £2 billion grant handed out by them a puny £163 million was devoted to SR. £971 million grant went to ‘affordable home ownership’ for 29,604 homes. £939 million was funding for 24,967 AR homes. 22,080 AR homes were built with nil grant. Usually these will be part funded by Right to Buy receipts and/or Section 106 monies (payments by developers associated with the cost of infrastructure). These are the ones which could be affected by the government policy for First Homes4 which would use Section 106 monies for ownership rather than for social housing.
Although AR has not so far replaced SR homes to the extent we feared, so long as AR continues to be funded then there will be less money available for SR. Every project funded by Homes England includes conversion of existing homes to AR. The level of funding of SR is so negligible that SR numbers will continue to decline unless the policy is changed. The number of SR council homes has fallen by 118,000 since 2012.
AR should be abandoned and all council properties should be charged SR. So long as there is so little grant for councils to build new council homes and Right to Buy remains in place, the number of council homes will continue to decline as they have done in every year since 1979. Introducing AR has failed to deliver more homes. Since 2010 there has been a fall in the number of council homes in England of 194,000.
Finally, because of the low grant level for new building schemes councils not only have to fund projects by charging AR, but they also have to take on extra borrowing. The cost of servicing the extra debt5 has to come from tenant rent which means that there is less money available for the maintenance and renewal of existing council housing stock. Servicing debt already takes up 16% of HRA income nationally. Less than 10% of expenditure goes on capital works (renewal of housing components) annually, work which is essential to maintain the housing to a decent standard.
If the average grant per SR property is £54,887 the 2,972 homes would add up to £163,124,165. So only 7.8% of funding has supported SR homes.
£993,907,682 has funded 24,967 AR homes, comprising 45.3% of funding.
£971,248,032 has funded “affordable ownership” comprising 46.8% of funding.
See the tables and read offline download a PDF here he funding
Good evening Martin
I put a message up on your site during the week I would much appreciate a reply, so that I can explain a few home truths as to how LA’s operate, my father now passed, was a labour activist well into his eighties and was never more proud of me when I launched the scheme for affordable social housing and was broken hearted when I explained the real truth. I have read your recent columns, and you quote various numbers and stats which are all true, however there are fundamental issues to understand before they matter. I would really appreciate a reply from you so that I can validate what I am saying and maybe give you the biggest platform you have ever had to take the fight to the heart of the matter.
Kindest regards Cliff Peters
Sent from my iPhone